Archive for the 'Rants' Category

13
Feb
12

Congress’ Timeline To Doom in 2012

The Payroll Tax Credit bill was just extended in Congress today for 10 months. Boehner and company stood at the microphone and said they had ‘caved’ to the Democrats on this policy, but really, didn’t they just kick the can down the road just past the 2012 elections?

Like Obama, much they do these days is seen as election-year manuevering and ass-kissing. It’s just that this started with the 2010 elections.

And the theme was crystal-clear, remember?

OCTOBER 2010:
GOP: “Put us in office. We’ll show you how to create jobs,
and begin showing this president and this adminsitra­­­­­­­­­­t­i­o­n
the door.” (quote)

NOVEMBER 2010:
Ok, you got it. Overwhelmi­­­­­­­­­­n­g majority. 63 new gains.
Virtual complete control.

DECEMBER 2010:
No job bills.

JANUARY 2011:
No job bills

FEBRUARY 2011:
No job bills

MARCH 2011:
No job bills

APRIL 2011:
No job bills

MAY 2011:
No job bills

JUNE 2011:
No job bills

JULY 2011:
No job bills

AUGUST 2011
No job bills

SEPTEMBER 2011
No job bills
Lots of Religious MumboJumbo

OCTOBER 2011
No job bills
NO AID FOR DISASTER VICTIMS
PLENTY OF CASH FOR SOCIAL ENGINEERIN­­­­­­­G

NOVEMBER 2011
No job bills
MANAGED TO REAFFIRM THE NATIONAL MOTTO

December 2011
No job bills
FOUND A SPOT FOR CHURCHILL’­­­­S STATUE

JANUARY 2012
HEY WHADAYA EXPECT?
WE MADE SURE WE ONLY WORK 6 DAYS THIS MONTH!

(courtesy poster on Huffpo 2/13/12)
26
Jan
12

WTF

For the first time in a long time I sat down and watched some of the campaigning going on for President on TV the other night. Unfortunately, it was the Florida GOP debate with Romney, Gingrich, Paul and Santorum.

What a fucking train wreck.

Romney and Gingrich played the role of rival children in the same sandbox,  spending the bulk of their time arguing about who’s cat was responsible for all the turds in the sand. Santorum was the shy new kid from down the block who stood at the edge of the playground, warily watching the two ‘big kids’ argue from a safe distance. Ron Paul, playing the role of the kind and soft-spoken grandfather from next door, spoke intelligently but nobody seemed to notice.

This is the best the GOP has to offer? Is this what we have to look forward to until November? Somebody hand me the remote. Give me Pawn Stars, American Restoration, or Diners, Drive-ins and Dives. I’ll even take re-runs of Restaurant Impossible.

God helps us all.

14
Dec
11

Really?

I’m not sure when or where it started, but I’ve recently become increasingly aware of the use of the word Really, or the phrase Really, (pause) Really as an expression of disapproval.

It typically surfaces in casual conversation, something like this:

MAN #1: “Hey Bob, I’m glad I caught up with you. How did the meeting go last night?

MAN # 2: “It was terrible. Check this out. I presented our proposal just like you and I had discussed, and the guy didn’t understand the concept. And I’m like, Really…I mean…dude…Really.” 

Notice I did not include a question mark at the end of Really. It probably should have one, but I’m trying to demonstrate by written word the voice inflection that accompanies this use of Really.

It’s not the type of Really that is spoken (or asked) in a manner consistent with surprise or excitement, such as when you tell your kids you’re taking them to Disneyland and they exclaim, “Really!?” Nor is it spoken in a manner of wonderment or inquisitiveness, as in when someone might share a secret with you and you reply, “Really?” as in “Oh my!” 

The “New” Really is spoken with an inflection that is more consistent with a statement than a question, but it is used in the context of a question. It usually carries a veiled condescending tone and a very slight questioning inflection. 

I’m not sure if it a regional thing here in the Pacific Northwest, or if like many new expressions it started in California (or some other part of the country) and it’s just making it’s way here. Often times we’re, “Late to the party” so to speak, tucked away in our little corner of the country.

Have any of you noticed this seemingly new and increased use of the word, Really? If you’re like me, once you’re aware of it, you’ll be noticing it all the time.

Or maybe I’m the one late to the party, and this has been around a long time.

08
Dec
11

Pumping Ethel

That’s an old adolescent joke, I know…

For those of you too young to remember, the higher-octane gasoline used to be called “Ethel” instead of “Super” or “Premium” as it is today. The name “Ethel” was derived from the additive tetraethel lead, which boosted octane, reduced engine ping, and helped lubricate valve guides. Its use was discontinued for environmental concerns back in the 70′s.

But that’s not what I wanted to vent about today. What irritates me to no end is how it takes damn near as long to put the last 50 cents worth of gas in my car as it does the first $19.50.

WTF?

It seemed to start right about the time gas prices went way up the last time around, as if it was some sort of psychological tool. With higher prices it took a lot less time to put $20 or $30 or $50 in the tank, so I speculated that maybe it was a way to make it seem like it took the same amount of time to fill up.

When I find myself standing out in the wind and the rain and the cold with places to go and things to to, and it’s taking F-O-R-E-V-E-R to put in that last little bit of gas I paid for, it just pisses me off. And don’t try to tell me it’s to reduce spillage, or to prevent sudden stops and/or impacts on the pump gear. I’m not buying it. If that was the case they could slow down the pump for the last 5 cents, not the last 50-plus cents. On some pumps it’s even worse.

Yeah, it’s a small, trivial issue. But I’ve got a $25-per-day gas bill for my commute, so I spend a fair amount of time at the pumps…and with each passing day it just continues to infuriate me.

Ok I feel better now.

Not.

26
Oct
11

How $29 Could Cost You Your Car, $10,000 And 3 Months In Jail

Welcome to Washington State.

A friend of mine was pulled over the other night by an officer of the Lakewood Police Department. Seems my friend was unaware he had a burned out tail light.

I’ve got no beef with the officer nor the Lakewood Police Dept. If you follow the news, Lakewood is where four officers were shot and killed at a coffee shop back in November of 2009. If anything, they deserve our respect and gratitude…but I digress.

My friend was also unaware his driver’s license was suspended. 

Without going into a lot of detail, his license was suspended as a result of not completely paying for a ticket he received after a snow and weather-related automobile accident last Winter (for not wearing a seatbelt). He sustained a concussion in the accident, and has very little memory of that day.

A few months later he learned of the citation from the accident when a collection agency came calling (he never received a ticket in the mail). He paid the collection agency off – or so he thought - and went on with his life as usual.  Then he was pulled over for the tail light, and the suspension came to light.

It seems there was still $29 left on his balance to the collection ageny, and as a result his license was suspended for not paying off his ticket. According to the collection agency, the $29, “was on record in a different office” than the one he was dealing with.

There is a new law in effect in Washington State that if you are caught driving on a suspended license, your car is impounded for 30 days. His car is now behind barbed wire and chain-link fence, accumulating storage fees that will total (according to the towing company) about $1700 by the time he is eligible to redeem his vehicle, plus a $100 fee payable to the Lakewood Police Department.

Furthermore, unless he can come up with 1/2 the estimated bill within 5 days of the impoundment, his car will be deemed “abandoned” and processed for auction.

But we’re just getting started. My friend is also facing a potential maximum penalty of $10,000 and 3 months in jail.

He doesn’t feel his car is worth the $1700 he will owe for it by the time he’s eligible to pay for it, so he’s considering just giving it to the towing company and letting it go to auction.

That’s all fine and well, except if the car only goes for $700 at auction, he’ll still owe the towing company the $1000 balance…or you guessed it…his license will be suspended again.

I understand the intent of the laws in our state, and the tough stance on driving with a suspended license. Habitual offenders, dangerous or wreckless drivers who endanger our safery need to be dealt with firmly.

But my friend is a good guy who honestly overlooked a $29 bill. It’s literally going to cost him his car – his only car - and now has the weight of possible jail time and excessive financial penalties hanging over his head as well.

Somehow, we need to find some balance and equity.

I know, I know…it’s not like he’s been falsely accused of murder and awaiting execution on death row, but I really feel for the guy.

And there’s nothing I can really do except write about it.

28
Aug
11

Feds raid Gibson guitar factory…

You’ve got to hear it and see it to believe it.

Your tax dollars at work…

05
Aug
11

‘Screw-All U-Haul” (please share)

I would appreciate everyone’s assistance in sharing this blog post. I will share to my Facebook wall when completed, and if everyone would click share and pass it on, I would be most thankful. Perhaps SOMEONE affiliated with U-HAUL will have a Google Alert set up for their company name and see this.  –Thank You!

THE LONG STORY:

A few years ago, our daughter and her boyfriend were residents of Vancouver, Washington. When a promising new job opportunity presented itself in Las Vegas, our daughter and her boyfriend placed the bulk of their personal belongings in a storage unit operated by U-Haul - located at 2460 NE Andresen Rd in Vancouver, WA – and moved to Nevada.

As will happen from time to time, the happy couple experienced some financial difficulties – and on a few occasions in 2010 we paid their storage bill for them.

On 3/5/11 an unexpected new charge appeared on our bank card from U-Haul Storage in the amount of $677.83. It turns out that not only did U-Haul retain our bank card information from a previous payment we had made, but opted to charge our card without authorization.

I called the storage facility and spoke to a man who knew nothing about the charge, and by all appearances seemed uninterested in discussing the matter with me. I told him in no uncertain terms that he needed to do whatever it took to insure no further unauthorized charges be made on our card, and that our bank card information be purged from the system.

We contested the unauthorized transaction through our bank and attempted to have the charges removed from our account with no success. I wrote to U-Haul’s corporate offices via the main website (through both the Public Relations Link and the online Contact Us Form on this page) to protest the charges, and my correspondence was never acknowledged, let alone replied to.

At this point we decided to let it go. The money was going towards our daughter’s storage unit after all, and she had promised to pay us back. We would be reimbursed in either case. Although it did not sit well with me, it wasn’t the end of the world – but it certainly was harbinger of our next dealings with U-Haul.

Our happy couple eventually parted ways but remained in touch.  He moved to Colorado, and she moved back home to our hometown. She started college while working part time as a barrista and all was well for a while.

Our daughter lost her job after being injured (off the job) and asked us again for help with her U-Haul storage bill, which had become delinquent after she had lost her job. Needless to say we did not hold U-Haul in high regard by this time, but agreed to help our daughter. She was concerned about losing her personal property.

On July 20th or 21st I called the U-Haul facility on Andresen Rd in Vancouver, WA and spoke to a woman by the name of Karen. I explained the situation, but did not bring up the previous issue regarding the unauthorized charge. I asked Karen what our daughter owed, including any late fees, to bring her current.

Karen told me that $763.79 would bring the unit current again. I asked Karen how much time we had to get this done. Karen told me the storage unit was, “In lien status, and scheduled to go to aution on 8/2/11.” Karen said a notice had been mailed on 7/12/11, and again that very day, advising of this.

  –I know this is a  l-o-n-g  post. Thanks for hanging in there with me!

At that time I confirmed that our daughter had authorization to come down, pay for the storage, and remove the contents. This was a bit of a gray area, as the storage unit was rented in the boyfriend’s name, and he was now living out of state. Karen told me yes, so I reserved a 17′ U-Haul truck for the following weekend. We made the necessary plans to drive 150 miles, pay off the storage unit, pick up the rental truck, load the contents and bring them back to our house for safekeeping.  Our only other option was to allow the storage unit to go to auction. That week I reorganized our basement to make room for all the stuff.

Upon arrival at U-Haul we were initially, “Helped” by a Mr. Brent Pelky, who held the title of Field Relief Manager. When we shared with him our daughter’s situation he told us that no auction date had been set for our daughter’s storage unit! When we attempted to share with him what Karen had told us on the phone, he abruptly and rather forcefully stated, “I SAID A DATE HAS NOT BEEN SET!” He then added, “…of course if you don’t pay it will eventually go to auction, but there has been no auction date set.”

We were dumfounded.  At this point Mr. Pelky said he could offer us a 50% settlement on the storage bill to close out the unit. All he needed was the boyfriend’s permission, since the storage unit was in his name. We explained that he was in Colorado, and that this weekend he was in the mountains in an area of no cell phone reception…but that we would try to reach him.

Mr. Pelky then said we had 24 hours to reach him, and to just have him fax a copy of his ID and permission – and gave us their fax number. We explained to him that we had already driven 150 miles to get there, arranged for extra labor (we had brought 2 extra people and our daughter), and that we could not spend the night in Vancouver. 

Mr. Pelky then informed us we could pay the whole bill and access the storage unit now, or wait on the boyfriend to fax his permission to accept the 50% settlement offer and get in then. With that Mr. Pelky started to leave. We asked him where he was going, and he said “I’m off for the day.” We told him we would keep trying to reach the boyfreind.

We were next assisted by Ms. Heather Suhama, with the title of Assistant Moving Center GM. Facing at least 4 hours of truck loading and having no intention of staying over in Vancouver (our helpers needed to return home that night), we felt we had no other option at that point but to pay the bill in full so we could gain access to the unit and start packing - hoping that before we finished, we would reach the boyfriend. We gave Heather $430 in cash and a check for $299.80 for the storage unit. We also gave her a bank card for $168 plus $9.95 for the truck rental, bringing the grand total to $907.75.

Then we were told that since Tara did not have a key it would be another $50 to have the lock removed.

We were about at our wit’s end by this point. Ms. Suhama said that’s just the way it was…unless we could convince one of the yard hands to do it for us.

We made arrangements to have the lock removed and began loading the truck. Shortly after this we were quite relieved to hear from the boyfriend who was back in cell phone range. He said he was on his way back from the mountains, and said he could be at a fax machine in 90 minutes - well before U-Haul’s closing time! The boyfriend said he would send whatever was needed, no problem.

We returned to the office and spoke to Ms. Suhama. “Good news!” we said. “The boyfriend is on his way back from the mountains, and can have the papers faxed over well before closing time.” Ms, Suhama said ok (she had been present during our discussions with Mr. Pelky and was familiar with our situation). She said all she needed to do was to call Mr. Pelky and get his permission.

We thought it rather odd for her to need to ask Mr. Pelky for his permission to honor the offer that he himself had made us - but we stood by while she called him.

When she got off the phone she informed us that Mr. Pelky said “You were given a choice: Choice A or Choice B. You took choice A. The offer is no longer available.”

We were stunned.

We finished loading the truck and left for home.

A couple days later I was able to reach a lady by the name of Lori who I believe was in the corporate regional office. I shared the entire story I just made you suffer through. I then said that, ”In light of the unauthorized charge to our bank card, the misrepresentations made as to the storage unit going to auction, and the offer extended us by your Field Relief Manager, I am requesting this offer be honored and that we be reimbursed 50% of the $763.79 storage bill.”

Lori started to say, “If you can get the boyfriend to fax…oh wait, can you hold while I check on something?” I said yes.

About 5 minutes she came back on the line. She said that U-Haul had violated their own policy and should have never released the contents of the storage unit to anyone without the signed permission of the contract holder. And she said there was nothing more she could do for me.

This brings us to an interesting place, doesn’t it? Seems to me U-Haul has openly admitted that they may have put themselves in a position of legal liability in an amount far exceeding the $381.89 I was asking for.

I have no intention of recommending to the boyfriend that he initiate legal action. I do intend however to do whatever I can to insure that U-Haul will lose at least $381.89 in lost rental business and loss of reputation, hence this blog post.

There are plenty of other self-storage facilities out there, and plenty of other truck rental providers - including Budget Truck RentalRyder and Penske to name a few. 

Please help me spread the word by clicking the “Share Button” which appears beneath this blog post in the “Comments” section. If you’ve read this on Facebook, please share and post to your wall – and encourage your friends to do the same. If nothing else, we can spread the news and I’ll feel satisfied that I took $381.89 in business from U-Haul even if it doesn’t end up in my pocket.

Thanks for your help, and letting me bend your ear :-)

ps: and one final message for U-Haul…if by chance you decide to do the right thing, I too will do the right thing and update this post with the good news. You can reach me through the ESARSEA tab at the top of this blog.

01
Jul
11

‘Slutwalkers’ Unite To Protest Treatment Of Sexual Assault Victims

Written by, and reprinted with permission from Anni Piper… 

“When I tell people how I spent the Queen’s Birthday weekend this year, the most common reaction is ‘What the heck is “Slutwalk”?’ Read on if you’d like to know……

Slutwalk is a protest against our legal system’s treatment of those who are sexually assaulted. Alongside a large group of others in their fishnets and corsets, I strutted through the streets of Sydney, figuratively giving the finger to those who would judge us on our manner of dress.

The first Slutwalk was organised earlier this year in Toronto, Canada, after a police officer told a group of female university students that they could avoid being sexually assaulted if they “didn’t dress like sluts”. This ignorant attitude is perpetuated daily, and it’s high time we turned it around. Research clearly shows that sex offenders do not target victims according to the clothes they wear, but rather by their vulnerability. Sex offenders target victims when they perceive an opportunity to manipulate them, by force or coercion, into a situation where they will be uninterrupted by witnesses.

I myself am a survivor of childhood sexual assault. In a trial earlier this year, the alleged offender (someone from outside the family) was found not guilty of over 30 counts of child sex offences. There was overwhelming evidence, found by police in this pervert’s bedroom, to prove I was telling the truth & justify the police prosecution. He confessed to police, and his legal team even offered a diminished guilty plea. We chose not to accept it and the case went to trial. What they were offering would have amounted to slap on the wrist and a very short custodial sentence, if any. This “man” should be spending the rest of his life in jail, where he can’t perpetrate against anyone else’s children. But of course, to ensure a “fair trial”, the jury couldn’t hear about his offers of a guilty plea, or of his prior criminal conviction for violence against women (and, of course, the intrinsic design of our wonderful legal system ensures that he did not even have to take the stand, nor be questioned in court in any way about any of the offences)

Before this I had always had faith in the legal system; I believed in the concept of justice. But after ten days of giving evidence, all my faith in our legal system was gone. Shamefully, the defence barrister  was allowed to question me about “how provocative” my manner of dress was as a fourteen year old girl. I was questioned about my album ‘Jailbait’ and its associated logo. I was questioned about whether professional photographs of me from my website were provocative. I was portrayed as a sexually precocious thirteen year old who willfully seduced a man in his forties. What a load of bullshit! I was outraged, not only for myself, but for the 1400 other survivors who go through this every year in NSW alone.

Sexual assault is an especially heinous crime. It’s also the easiest crime of all to get away with, and the predators that commit these crimes know this. Currently, in the NSW District Court, 80% of ‘alleged’ child sex offenders are found not guilty.

As a parent, I find this an alarming statistic. Our police do not press charges in this type of crime unless they are absolutely certain an offence has been committed. Keep in mind that only a small amount of victims ever come forward, and only a fraction of these cases ever go to trial. There is only one way to explain it; sex offenders are getting away with their crimes. The legal system is failing us all – survivors, parents, and our community as a whole.

My song ‘Jailbait’ is based on some of my experiences as a child. Little was I to know that art would imitate life, as per my lyrics:

Judge just set you walkin’ free, when he took one long look at me

As it turns out, in reality that’s exactly what happened. That the jury has very strong belief of guilt is simply not good enough under the current system. Juries are instructed by Judges that they must, beyond all reasonable doubt, be able to prove that each & every charge can be proven beyond all reasonable doubt….something astoundingly difficult to do when physical evidence is often not freely available.

I’m on a mission to end this appalling treatment of sexual assault victims in the legal system. We must stop blaming the victims and start punishing the offenders. How can you help? More details to come soon…..”

For more information about Slutwalk, including upcoming satellite marches in your area, visit Slutwalk’s website here. – SRC

03
Jun
11

!@#$%^&*()_+

Greetings from Washington State – home of 41 Las Vegas-style tribal casinos, countless other non-tribal casinos and card rooms, legal horse race betting, and state administered gambling such as Daily Keno games, Pick 3, Hit 5, Lotto, Mega Millions Lottery, Power Ball Lottery, and scratch tickets ranging in price from $1 to $20 each. 

However, don’t get caught playing 5-cent/10-cent stakes poker on the internet. It’s a felony here. That’s right, a felony. Washington State prohibits online poker with laws that are over and above the applicable Federal statues.

Residents can spend unlimited amounts of money on state-operated gambling (on games that are pure luck), but cannot compete in an online game of skill that contains an element of risk.

More accurately, it’s only ok to gamble in Washington State when said gambling generates revenue for the state. I am so tired of the fucking hypocrisy and ignorance here. Washington State laws have nothing to do with the issue of gambling per se. In this case our state laws are little more than cattle guards, fences and barricades designed to heard gamblers and card players to the troughs that feed state coffers.

It’s the equivalent of having state-operated brothels within a jurisdiction that prohibits at-home masturbation under penalty of law.




Categories

 

February 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829  

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 14 other followers

Blog Stats

  • 103,386 BS BLOG visits to date

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.